AI GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK MODULE

AI Governance Framework Module

Firm-level authority and structure, for firms with something to govern

This module establishes who actually has the authority to approve or shut down an AI tool, and the methodology behind that decision. It's built for firms with enough attorneys and practice groups to need a real committee structure — a solo or small firm is usually better served starting with the Ethics module instead. If you're managing multiple practice groups or a growing AI footprint, this is where oversight gets formalized.

Documents in this module

AI GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORKDocument

AI Governance Charter

Real authority, not an aspiration statement

A formal charter establishing your firm's AI Governance Committee — authority, composition, decision rights, and reporting lines — fulfilling Rule 5.1 management-supervision obligations. Defines tool-approval authority, policy maintenance duties, risk oversight, and quarterly reporting to firm management.

WHAT'S INCLUDED
  • Committee authority and composition (Chair, Ethics Counsel, Technology Lead, practice group reps)
  • Tool approval authority and registry maintenance
  • Quarterly meeting and reporting cadence
  • Best suited to firms of 10+ attorneys with multiple practice groups
USE CASES
Mid-size and large firm AI oversightMulti-practice-group coordinationRule 5.1 management documentation
View details →
Contact us for assistance
AI GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORKDocument

AI Risk Assessment Procedures

The methodology behind every tool-approval decision

A structured, repeatable process for evaluating AI tool risk before adoption and annually thereafter — the risk-management foundation for defensible AI governance. Assesses confidentiality, professional responsibility, and operational risk via a four-tier rating system tied to approval authority.

WHAT'S INCLUDED
  • Three risk domains: confidentiality, professional responsibility, operational
  • Four-tier rating system (Low / Medium / High / Unacceptable)
  • Assessment triggers: new tool, annual review, vendor change, incident
  • Minimum 5-year documentation retention standard
USE CASES
New AI tool evaluationAnnual vendor review cycleFeeds Governance Charter and Approved Tool Registry
View details →
Contact us for assistance

Not sure which documents you need?

The Phase 0™ Assessment scores your firm's AI governance readiness and tells you exactly where to start.

Ask about Phase 0™